<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FeedLounge</title>
	<link>http://o20db.com/db/feedlounge/</link>
	<description>Where to find the best Office 2.0 applications</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: IT&#124;Redux - Feed Reader Roundup</title>
		<link>http://o20db.com/db/feedlounge/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://o20db.com/db/feedlounge/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>[...] Price From all the applications we reviewed, only two offer a commercial version (FeedLounge and NewsGator), and only one among them (FeedLounge) does not offer a free version. Why anyone would pay for an online feed reader is beyond me though. From a business model standpoint, the vendors we reviewed either rely on advertising, or leverage what really is a loss leader application as a marketing tool, as is the case for Google Reader owned by Google, or Bloglines owned by InterActiveCorp. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Price From all the applications we reviewed, only two offer a commercial version (FeedLounge and NewsGator), and only one among them (FeedLounge) does not offer a free version. Why anyone would pay for an online feed reader is beyond me though. From a business model standpoint, the vendors we reviewed either rely on advertising, or leverage what really is a loss leader application as a marketing tool, as is the case for Google Reader owned by Google, or Bloglines owned by InterActiveCorp. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
